Difference between revisions of "C:GCC"

From Amiga Coding
Jump to: navigation, search
(added a few links)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
  
==Performance==
+
>==Performance==
According to some developers on the NatAmi project the code resulting from compiling GCC for 68k has degraded with newer versions of GCC. (GCC 2.9 seems to create better/faster 68k code than GCC 3.4 and GCC 4.2) [http://www.natami.net/knowledge.php?b=4&note=8]
+
According to some developers on the NatAmi project the code resulting from compiling GCC for 68k has degraded with newer versions of GCC. (GCC 2.9 seems to create better/faster 68k code than GCC 3.4 and GCC 4.2) [http://www.natami.net/knowledge.php?b=4&note=8]
  
 +
----
 +
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
 +
----
 +
=[http://ozewemavigu.co.cc UNDER COSTRUCTION, PLEASE SEE THIS POST IN RESERVE COPY]=
 +
----
 +
=[http://ozewemavigu.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
 +
----
 +
</div>
  
 
==Links==
 
==Links==

Revision as of 03:06, 18 November 2010

..todo..


>==Performance== According to some developers on the NatAmi project the code resulting from compiling GCC for 68k has degraded with newer versions of GCC. (GCC 2.9 seems to create better/faster 68k code than GCC 3.4 and GCC 4.2) [1]



UNDER COSTRUCTION, PLEASE SEE THIS POST IN RESERVE COPY


CLICK HERE


Links

Downloads


Information