Difference between revisions of "C:GCC"

From Amiga Coding
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by Anacicyh (Talk); changed back to last version by Spellcoder)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
  
>==Performance==
+
==Performance==
According to some developers on the NatAmi project the code resulting from compiling GCC for 68k has degraded with newer versions of GCC. (GCC 2.9 seems to create better/faster 68k code than GCC 3.4 and GCC 4.2) [http://www.natami.net/knowledge.php?b=4&note=8]
+
According to some developers on the NatAmi project the code resulting from compiling GCC for 68k has degraded with newer versions of GCC. (GCC 2.9 seems to create better/faster 68k code than GCC 3.4 and GCC 4.2) [http://www.natami.net/knowledge.php?b=4&note=8]
  
----
 
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
 
----
 
=[http://ozewemavigu.co.cc UNDER COSTRUCTION, PLEASE SEE THIS POST IN RESERVE COPY]=
 
----
 
=[http://ozewemavigu.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
 
----
 
</div>
 
  
 
==Links==
 
==Links==

Latest revision as of 20:31, 22 November 2010

..todo..


Performance

According to some developers on the NatAmi project the code resulting from compiling GCC for 68k has degraded with newer versions of GCC. (GCC 2.9 seems to create better/faster 68k code than GCC 3.4 and GCC 4.2) [1]


Links

Downloads


Information